What is Classical Liberalism?

"Prior to the 20th century, classical liberalism was the dominant political philosophy in the United States. It was the political philosophy of Thomas Jefferson and the signers of the Declaration of Independence and it permeates the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Federalist Papers and many other documents produced by the people who created the American system of government. Many of the emancipationists who opposed slavery were essentially classical liberals, as were the suffragettes, who fought for equal rights for women." John C. Goodman National Center for Policy Analysis

Featured Quote

"The Nazis are well remembered for murdering well over 11 million people in the implementation of their slogan, 'The public good before the private good,' the Chinese Communists for murdering 62 million people in the implementation of theirs, 'Serve the people,' and the Soviet Communists for murdering more than 60 million people in the implementatio of Karl Marx's slogan, 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.' Anyone who defends any of these, or any variation of them, on the grounds of their 'good intentions' is an immoral (NOT 'amoral') enabler of the ACTUAL (not just proverbial) road to hell." Rick Gaber

Tea Party Review Magazine

The Tea Party Review Magazine and $2.49 book offer
Become an affiliate of Tea Party Review Magazine for free and put some good old fashioned capital in your pocket! Use the sign-up form located below the posts of this blog and you'll be on your way to strengthening, not only the Tea Party movement, but your wallet too!

May 17, 2011

Status of My Blogs "The Conservative Rainbow" & "The Objectivist Chronicle"

I am going to be putting to "sleep" The Conservative Rainbow for awhile. I'm not deleting this blog in case I want to come back to it in the future. I will only be maintaining, actively, The Objectivist Chronicle.  I will probably wait a few months from the date of this post before I put to sleep this blog.  I want visitors who come here to be able to find me over at my other blog, The Objectivist Chronicle.  Please feel free--if you follow me here through Google or some other "Follow" mechanism--to follow me at The Objectivist Chronicle.  I have widgets there as well.  If you follow me on Facebook you may have already read this posted as a note there.  I may retain my political email:  proudgayconserv@aol.com simply because it gets to be quite the hassle switching things around.   

I have come to realize of late that I can no longer, in good conscience, uphold Conservatism. Until Conservatism (if it ever had any meaning as a label) goes back to meaning individual freedom and the maintenance of individual liberty as opposed to the promotion of the supremacy of religious ideology through the force of law over the mind of man, then I will no longer promote it. Thomas Jefferson stated:

I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
There are religious people in this country who want to impose their religious beliefs on others legislatively.  That is also a form of big government.  To share a popular philosophical and Objectivist saying, in the realm of Reason which is absolute, "You cannot have your cake and eat it too." Various religions and their sects are man-made and they are not always grounded in truth or reason, therefore, that means all attempts of legislating their supremacy over the mind of man, is the attempt of one man to impose his will forcefully on another. I can no longer condone that, support it, or sanction it...because it is evil. Men are accountable as individuals and there are ways to improve society through voluntary means which maintains man's freedom as well as his sovereignty over his own mind and body.  We have become a nation of cannibals--cannibals feeding on people's minds, bodies, and souls.  This needs to stop if we are to remain free.

It has been suggested to me by various followers in the past, either on this blog or over at Facebook--that my promotion of various attitudes which allow people to privately contract with others in regards to medical decisions they wish to make for themselves or others--will eventually lead to things like eugenics, mass slaughter, or collectivist evil.  This is nonsense.  A private contract is a private contract.  If it is made between two individuals and the government does not stick its nose into the process (which ultimately is where many of our legal problems and overly legislated society come from)--then there is absolutely no need to believe, if the government is not involved, that those private contracts would lead to those collectivist evils.  That is a ridiculous notion. Collectivism has sprung from secular and religious societies alike down through history; Soviet Russia sprang from extremely mystical traditions which upheld religious, altruistic notions.  There have also been nations which had secular societies which sprouted collectivist evil.  The problem springs from false premises people maintain in regards to what their duties are and are not in regards to their relationship with their fellow citizens.  Not to mention, laissez-faire capitalism is based on the notion of private contracts between two parties.  Only the people involved in that contract need to be concerned--and no one else.  When they have a dispute it is up to the courts to decide objectively how to settle the dispute based on the legal contract which was signed by both parties. 

Which, by the way, brings me to another point about the degradation of our society--the inability to mind our own Goddamn business.  And in this, news anchors, the mass media, politicians and unscrupulous lawyers looking to make an easy buck are all culpable.  When someone has decided to have a no-resuscitate rule upheld legally should they become unable to live their life in a manner that is productive and dignified to a human being--we do not need to hear for weeks on end from endless parades of busy bodies why what they did was wrong, right, and every shade in-between.  If that's what they wanted--and it was contracted privately and legally--it doesn't matter to anyone one else.  

It has also been suggested to me by others that a society not grounded in religious ideology (a theocracy--because that's exactly what it would be), would also lead to the outcomes I mentioned above.  That is also ridiculous.  If we maintain separations between Church and State, Economics and State, Science and State, and Education and State and return to limiting the government to its proper foundations--none of the above fear-mongering by those with other agendas (those who want to institute their economic or religious collectivist beliefs onto others) is remotely possible.  We have only had peaceful co-existence among various religious faiths in this country to the extent that the government has kept its nose out of playing legislative favorites with one faith over another.  Although, that is quickly becoming a problem too.

If the Tea Party and the Republicans fail in their mission to restore laissez-fair capitalism and freedom to this nation it will be because they decided to uphold religious ideology over economic and social freedom as well as continuing to promote the evil of altruism as a method by which to deal with others. Those are the causes. Our destruction will be the effect.

I am opposed to the secular, immoral, collectivism of the Left which is grounded in subjectivism and I am opposed to anyone on the Religious Right who supports collectivist, theocratic notions which deal with people in a forceful manner. Men can only remain free when they choose to deal with each other as equal, sovereign individuals in a voluntary manner.  If you have a moral issue with particual actions people take then you have the freedom to go out and privately promote what you think is morally best and provide an arena to people who want a different option--and let the free market of ideas take care of the rest.  Just keep your organization's nose away from busy-body politicians.  They will sour your organization more quickly than anything else.  The good will always win out when that is upheld as a standard.

I will no longer sanction the ridiculous growth of our government beyond its bounds of protection of individual freedom via the attempt to throw a legislative noose around my neck making me economically responsible for other people. Justice requires and demands that men are treated and dealt with as individuals...not as some pawn in a game to make others feel justified in their religious beliefs or their beliefs that they are owed something by society. A free society owes you nothing other than what you work to gain for yourself and those whom you value.

I will continue to work voraciously to uphold economic freedom from the dictates of the Left. I am also going to branch out my work into exposing organized religion's ties to the government, politicians, and economics. They want to use such devices to impose their religious morality on everyone else. Organized religion is a form of collectivist doctrine which I will also no longer condone as long as it is attempting to impose its will on others.  Religion does, at times, run parallel and can discover the same truths which philosophy does.  Religion was (is) ultimately a primitive form of philosophy.  However, many times religion seeks to uphold things which are not only in conflict with man's freedom and the good but actively help to undermine man's freedom and which help to support evil; whether it is intentional or by default--means little.  The result is the same:  tyranny.  

I am dedicated to man's freedom. I deal with others voluntarily as I expect them to deal with me. I will not promote, sanction, or help evil in its purposes to subvert this free nation from it's philosophical moorings grounded in individual freedom.

If you are religious and on my friend list I welcome you to stay if you see the truth in my words above. If you do not, then you are welcome to leave with my blessings. Just know this--I will no longer bend to politically correct language and parse my words for the sake of sparing people's feelings.  I'm done with being afraid to speak the truth.  This nation will not survive if we are concerned about people's feelings while hiding behind politically correct language which does an extraordinary disservice to those who seek to understand man, his place in the universe, and the philosophical principles which must be maintained in order to retain his freedom. 

Thank you,

Christopher Budden

May 11, 2011

Freedom of Religion: Fine Until Thine Is Supposed To Become Mine

The other day I walked by a parked car in a parking lot that had the following bumper sticker:  Freedom of Religion Means Any Religion.  Now, I certainly don't know the owner of this car's specific intentions behind posting this bumper sticker.  However, that phrase has been used to justify appeasement and toleration of Islamic extremists and their beliefs within our free nation.  We can see what that type of appeasement has brought to other Western countries...and it's not good.  Islamic women have been murdered in once (mostly) free Western countries all in the name of Shariah Law being upheld.  This should not be happening in free countries.  Incidentally, this is what makes the Left so unbelievable wrong on this entire topic (like they are on most other things). 

The Left complains when the Ten Commandments appear in a courthouse--but they are entirely willing to allow Islamists in our country go ahead and murder their daughters and wives because they looked at them the wrong way.  Ayn Rand once stated in regards to contradictions:
Contradictions do not exist.  Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises.  You will find that one of them is wrong.
As an Objectivist, I'm dedicated to reason and it's application to governance, interpersonal relationships, science, education, etc...basically, any way in which it can help us out from under the collectivist yoke towards which we are slipping.  And I am whole-heartedly dedicated to individual freedom.  For me, that means, not only economic freedom, but freedom of conscience as well.  I have my own particular views on religion and I'm no longer ashamed to admit I've moved beyond them.  I was raised Evangelical Lutheran and later on I studied Paganism and Buddhism.  It is not that I don't ponder God or the possibility of an afterlife, but I have found it to be completely irrelevant in regards to the discussion of maintaining individual freedom.  Politics is contentious to begin with but then when you mix faith into the discussion it becomes ten times worse--and that much more confusing.  Ayn Rand state of religion:
Philosophy is the goal toward which religion was only a helplessly blind groping. The grandeur, the reverence, the exalted purity, the austere dedication to the pursuit of truth, which are commonly associated with religion, should properly belong to the field of philosophy.
And:
Religion is a primitive form of philosophy, the attempt to offer a comprehensive view of reality.
I realize, writing this on a Conservative blog could be construed as offensive.  I don't mean it that way.  However, the truth is, most religions are just that--they are man's attempt at trying to find someway to explain his existence, his role in it, how he deals with others and what his moral guidance should be.  Accept, morality and ethics are the science of how they are applied to the decisions individuals make.  The moment you "collectivize" an ethical system, it no longer supports the individual; it supports a collective ideology. 

If you've ever heard the statement, "The freedom to swing your fist ends where the other guys nose begins," you will understand my point regarding those who are so eager to allow dangerous, extremist, and theocratic ideologies to start dictating to our legal system as Islam has done in other Western countries.  Freedom of the individual is absolutely incompatible with religious doctrine that says, "You must think this, do this, or you are considered an infidel."

The freedom to practice a religion ends where the other guys religion begins--or in the case of atheists--doesn't begin.  I'm an enormous advocate of separation of Church and State--not in the sort of muddled way in which some people promote this notion, but, in an actual separation between Church and State.  As wonderful as our Founding Fathers were, they left some things entirely too open to interpretation.  One only has to ponder the economic mess this country is in to know that is true.

I have seen this bumper sticker as well:







  
 
 
 
 
 
 
I understand the purpose behind this bumper sticker.  But, when you really think about it--I mean really think about it--how ridiculous is this?  Adherents to every one of these faiths believes their faith is superior, their faith is the one and only truth, their faith is the morality to be followed; not only does that breed vast amounts of subjectivism (just what collectivist evil needs to feed off of) but how do you begin to have a discussion when you can't even decide whose is the right one to follow?  Now think about that previous statement of mine above:  their faith is the morality to be followed.  That doesn't exactly smell of individual liberty now does it?  Oh--did I find another contradiction? 
 
If you are a free individual who fully understands all that is supposed to mean--how do you "coexist" with a religion that tells you if you don't follow us you are an infidel and deserve to have your head hacked off?  Putting Islam aside for a moment, how do any of these religions in the coexist bumper sticker even begin to have a conversation as to what's rational?  The Jews don't see Jesus as anything other than a prophet.  The Christians view Jesus as the Son of God.  The Buddhists "live" to deny reality by blanking out their minds to find "bliss" rather than facing reality as it is in order to maintain their life.  The Pagans will find and use any former God or Goddess to suit their particular psychological needs of the moment while claiming the planets and their positions influence our behavior. The Islamists still haven't had a "reformation" which is a nice way of saying Islam hasn't "injected some logic and reason into the faith" so they can do what they have to do as human beings to live and maintain their lives free of oppression!
 
Collectivists live via their emotions, faith is an emotion.  Emotions are barometers which guage your relationship to existence--they can inform you when you are on a good path or a bad path.  But, they don't tell you anything about reality in particular.  "Hope" does not make something true.  "Hate" does not make something wrong--it can make something good if you hate the right thing.  Love does not apply to your abuser--at least not if you have an ounce of self-respect and self-esteem.
 
Buddhists = Hoping violent people don't exist won't make them not exist as something you need to defend against in the here and now.
 
Islamists = Denying half of your populations talent pool (women) from being able to lead normal, creative lives contributing to your existence won't pull your nations out of the Middle Ages muck in which they are currently mired.
 
Pagans = No matter which way the stars are aligned the decision still has to be yours to get your ass out of bed every morning and be productive, get to work, and support yourself--no matter how many spells you cast, circles you dance around, or money trees you create.  It's still ultimately up to you.
 
Christians = Dump the altruism!  This one concept of "sacrifice as the good" has done more damage and spread more evil across the planet than can even be counted!  Learn to promote the notion of trade between peoples instead.  Altruism is evil.  Trade is justice.  There's a reason modern day churches and even the Catholic Church is getting in on the "social justice" bandwagon--because altruism teaches them it's the right thing to do!   
 
If people really want to support individual freedom--then they have to find a means to do it that is consistent in its support of the individual, non-contradictory in it's support of individuals to make their own decisions which support their life, and is a rational basis for understanding and maintaining human freedom.
 
Ultimately, I don't give a damn what you believe privately--but, unfortunately we are now in a position in this country where we have to begin acknowledging that what we may believe privately has been directly contributing to our problems.  Cause and effect.  Ideas have consequences--even ideas we may hold subconsciously.  To end this post:
It has often been noted that a proof of God would be fatal to religion: a God susceptible of proof would have to be finite and limited; He would be one entity among others within the universe, not a mystic omnipotence transcending science and reality. What nourishes the spirit of religion is not proof, but faith, i.e., the undercutting of man’s mind.
...and I would add...man's freedom.

May 1, 2011

BREAKING: Usama Bin Laden Is Dead












Usama bin Laden is dead, sources say.  From FOX News:
Usama bin Laden is dead, multiple sources confirm to Fox News. He was killed a week ago by a U.S. bomb.

President Obama is expected to deliver a statement from the White House Sunday night to discuss the major development.

The announcement comes nearly a decade after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks which started a tireless hunt for the terrorist mastermind and Al Qaeda leader.

The U.S. had been waiting for the results of a DNA test to confirm his identity before going public. Sources said the vice president informed congressional leaders late Sunday night that bin Laden had indeed been killed

Tea Party Magazine Affiliate Form

Personal Info
Additional info

Featured Video

Featured Site


Get a playlist! Standalone player Get Ringtones
I would like to give a shout out to Tammy Bruce and Mark Levin! I love the music they use on their radio shows. "What Is Love", "Release Me", "Hang On" and "Call on Me" in the playlist above are from their shows. Hat tip guys!

Purging Leftism from America

Purging Leftism from America
A friend of mine, Jeremy Buff, designed the picture above. He is a web designer. Click the image for his services!